>From: "Tim Dugger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>OK, so far all I have done with this topic is just skim over the
>messages, but I think that I am gonna go ahead an drop in my own
>two cents worth (worth actually much less than that due to inflation)
Hey Tim, thanks for your contrib...
>I am sorry if I upset anybody, but my personal opinion is that those
>folks who are argueing against it (and by this point, that distinction
>has become kinda murky in many cases), are those most likely to
>abuse the use of another's trademark.
*ABUSE* is the wrong word. The real issue for us out here who are arguing
against the clause is that (under the statute) there are certain situations
where it is absolutely legal and appropriate to use another's trademark - to
prevent customer confusion and promote competition for instance.
This clause eliminates those appropriate uses.
I *emphatically* have no desire to do anything shady with WotC's trademarks.
Faust
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
