[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My advice is to do what you mentioned in another post: simplify the language.
> As a final step, however, have your legal team, or whoever is doing the
> actual writing, to sit down with a few intelligent, non-gaming, high school
> students and see if they can answer some comprehension questions.
Not a bad idea. Perhaps some sort of (non-legally binding) "In other words"
statement around the OGL site and so forth. If people, after reading the OGL,
have to seek out more information and do a bit of research themselves before
utilizing it they will likely be better off for it.
Simple enough to draw interested parties in; comprehensive enough to make
users double-check themselves.
word,
will
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
