Sean wrote: "I don't see a need to lable every individual bit as OGC in the main body of the product--it's too distracting for the gamers and DMs who don't care." You dont need to label anything in the body text. The license doesnt require that. It must be clearly identified. That can be done in the back of the product. There is no requirement that everything that is OGC be marked. Clark ===== http://www.necromancergames.com "3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Christopher DeLisle
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Rogers Cadenhead
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Christopher DeLisle
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Sean Campbell
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 MaggieVining
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 William Olander
