--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 2/14/03 1:21:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > writes: > > > > <<So NOTHING in the Agreement was "documented > > explicitly to the contrary"; but I don't think that has any bearing one > way > > or the other on Wizards' ability to revoke the draft material at will, > > without notice. > > >> > > > Most common law allows for "at will" termination with "reasonable notice". > It is _because_ of the lack of explicit terms that I'd assume that > "reasonable notice" would be required. That's the reason I feel that people > > who've spent a lot of time and money and are going to press now are probably > > OK, but people going to press in a few months might not be. > > It depends on how much, if anything, was documented.
The thing is, WotC never explicitly gave up their rights to those creatures. They never appeared on the WotC SRD page. Ever. ===== - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fred Wolke - Homo Cervicalgia __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
