> John Nephew said, "I find it vexing that my company > has expended significant > time and effort complying with the licenses, while > other companies seem to > have concluded that license compliance is a waste of > time and effort that > might otherwise be spent on dumping yet another new > release on the market."
I agree with John. It is time consuming, but we have an obligation to do it right. I will not lower my standards and hope you all wont either. The problem, as mentioned before, is there is no real market influence to do it right. So it is up to our own sense of fair play and responsibility to do it properly and to continue to discuss ways to do it better. I think this list has accomplished that and continues to do so. My designation from Tome of Horrors and my change in approach to some other things were a direct result of discussions on this list. If you truly care about OGC correctness, go review the products on ENWorld and give them low marks. Maybe that is the only way to provide a market influence. In my mind, the companies that are doing it poorly are doing it on purpose. Clark ===== http://www.necromancergames.com "3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel" _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
