> The point being, is that if any of the text was already open > then as an end user, provided I follow the requirements of > the OGL, then I can use that text verbatim. I need not > rewrite it from scratch.Matthew. Yes, you can. But if you do (and it is OBVIOUS that you have done so) then you have created a derivative work, and you ARE under a legal obligation to clearly mark that text (TEXT, not RULES) as OGC.
Yes you can - in which case, feel free to go back to the original source. However, we are under no obligation to use that open text. We can monkey around with it as we wish.
Plan fact of the matter, you have FAILED in that respect.
There is nothing clear about your designation.
We have yet to hear from ONE SINGLE PERSON who has looked at your designation and actually BEEN ABLE to decipher what text is open and what is closed. Nobody.
If you really are STILL thinking - and continuing to maintain - that your OGC designation is "clear" then I would probably suggest that you might need to seek some professional help, because the road that your brain is on does not seem to cross the reality turnpike at any point.
Somewhat true, because frankly, what we all want to hear is how you plan on FIXING your non-compliant products.> Your answer seems most insufficient. No - it is not what you want to hear.
We're all ears.
Faust
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
