Hi Matthew, I am a copyright holder that you used in the Ultimate Feats book. I was just about to send you a letter requesting that you clearly mark my OGC. I was then going to send an email to the other copyright holders informing them of the stituation and urging them to also send you letters.
I am glad that you have decided to amend the declaration of OGC in your book. I am however troubled by the following statement: "However, I am afraid, for now at least, our 'regular' books will remain as they have been - we _do_ have valid reasons for doing this with our own material and, as I have pointed out in previous posts, you can easily follow the 'rules-only' line if there are no other previous sources to be concerned about." You still need to mark WOTC's OGC clearly. But that is a matter between you and WOTC. I don't know the level of OGC reuse in your 'regular' books. If you use any of my OGC in the future I request that you clearly mark it and I do not consider "..all rules and derived content is OGC" as being clearly marked. I would like to avoid this situation for future products. Again, thank you for taking steps to rectify the current situation. Scott Metzger Get paid to surf the web! http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=ANY-592 ___________________________________________________________ Get your own Web-based E-mail Service at http://www.zzn.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
