> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:01:16 -0500, Steve Creech wrote: > >What it boils down to is that regardless of what folks on this list > >may think, it is no one other than Wizard's responsible to police > >the OGL. > > I don't think that's true. Several people here have raised issues > with how their own work was reused and licensed in a Mongoose > product. The OGL states that a publisher who has been notified they > are in breach of the license must correct the problem. It doesn't say > that WOTC is the only entity that can provide such notification.
Correct. Any copyright holder has that right. The license doesn't take the copyright away. On the contrary, it reiterates it several times. The licence was created by WotC, but the terms of the contract make it between all the Contributors whose OGC is used, and the licencee. The 'automatic termination' from Sec. 13 could easily be used by a Copyright holder in court (once the 30 days had passed) See, not all of my money to lawyers went to waste. :p Andrew McDougall a.k.a. Tir Gwaith _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
