closed source. hahaha. I figure they give you europeans so much vacation you have time
to build big open source packages like OJB. Here in Silicon Valley they try to get
their money's worth from their programmers ;) Maybe I should move to europe soon,
anyone got a spare room?
we've had some setbacks, but we should have something checked in soon. When it's ready
for the light of day, it'll be put in CVS.
m
-----Original Message-----
From: Mahler Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 9/11/2002 6:30 AM
To: 'OJB Users List'
Cc:
Subject: AW: The OJB JDO implementation is not finished, how can I start using
OJB?
We have such a layer working in my company. Unfortunately is is closed
source :-(
The basic idea is very simple:
1. have Transaction interface. providing methods like begin(), commit(),
abort() lockRead(...), lockwrite(...), getObjectByQuery(Query),
getCollectionByQuery(Query), etc.
2. write a OJB ODMG Implementation of this interface.
3. write a TransactionFactory that serves TransactionOjbImpls.
cheers,
Thomas
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Max Rydahl Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. September 2002 22:18
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: The OJB JDO implementation is not finished, how can I start
> using OJB?
>
>
> This question is listed in the faq and I think I understand
> the most of the
> answer - but does someone have a concrete example of "Using your own
> Transaction interface in conjunction with the OJB query api
> will provide a
> simple but powerful abstraction of the underlying persistence layer."
>
> /max
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<winmail.dat>>
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
