Hi,
Just found this message in the archive; is an example of the
Transaction interface talked about below and in the FAQ available
from cvs now?
Eliot
----------------------------------------------
From: Matthew Baird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
closed source. hahaha. I figure they give you europeans so much
vacation you have time to build big open source packages like
OJB. Here in Silicon Valley they try to get their money's worth
from their programmers ;) Maybe I should move to europe soon,
anyone got a spare room?
we've had some setbacks, but we should have something checked in
soon. When it's ready for the light of day, it'll be put in CVS.
m
-----Original Message-----
From: Mahler Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 9/11/2002 6:30 AM
To: 'OJB Users List'
Cc:
Subject: AW: The OJB JDO implementation is not finished, how can
I start using OJB?
We have such a layer working in my company. Unfortunately is is
closed source :-(
The basic idea is very simple:
1. have Transaction interface. providing methods like begin(),
commit(), abort() lockRead(...), lockwrite(...),
getObjectByQuery(Query), getCollectionByQuery(Query), etc.
2. write a OJB ODMG Implementation of this interface.
3. write a TransactionFactory that serves TransactionOjbImpls.
cheers,
Thomas
> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Max Rydahl Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. September 2002 22:18
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: The OJB JDO implementation is not finished, how can I
start > using OJB?
>
>
> This question is listed in the faq and I think I understand
> the most of the
> answer - but does someone have a concrete example of "Using
your own > Transaction interface in conjunction with the OJB query
api > will provide a
> simple but powerful abstraction of the underlying persistence
layer." >
> /max
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
