No.

cheers, Thomas

Eliot wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just found this message in the archive; is an example of the
> Transaction interface talked about below and in the FAQ available
> from cvs now?
> 
> Eliot
> ----------------------------------------------
> From: Matthew Baird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> closed source. hahaha. I figure they give you europeans so much
> vacation you have time to build big open source packages like
> OJB. Here in Silicon Valley they try to get their money's worth
> from their programmers ;) Maybe I should move to europe soon,
> anyone got a spare room? 
> we've had some setbacks, but we should have something checked in
> soon. When it's ready for the light of day, it'll be put in CVS. 
> m
> 
>       -----Original Message----- 
>       From: Mahler Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>       Sent: Wed 9/11/2002 6:30 AM 
>       To: 'OJB Users List' 
>       Cc: 
>       Subject: AW: The OJB JDO implementation is not finished, how can
> I start using OJB?    
>       
> 
>       We have such a layer working in my company. Unfortunately is is
> closed        source :-(
>       The basic idea is very simple:
>       1. have Transaction interface. providing methods like begin(),
> commit(),     abort() lockRead(...), lockwrite(...),
> getObjectByQuery(Query),      getCollectionByQuery(Query), etc.
>       2. write a OJB ODMG Implementation of this interface.
>       3. write a TransactionFactory that serves TransactionOjbImpls.
>       
>       cheers,
>       Thomas
>       
>       > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
>       > Von: Max Rydahl Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>       > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. September 2002 22:18
>       > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       > Betreff: The OJB JDO implementation is not finished, how can I
> start > using OJB?
>       >
> 
>>This question is listed in the faq and I think I understand
> 
>       > the most of the
>       > answer - but does someone have a concrete example of "Using
> your own      > Transaction interface in conjunction with the OJB query
> api   > will provide a
>       > simple but powerful abstraction of the underlying persistence
> layer."       >
> 
>>/max
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to