Hi,

I used the farAway configuration as a sample and modified the
MultipleDatabas
test case for my configuration.
Is the faraway test case included in the normal junit tests? I don't think
that the
faraway database is created by the prepare-testdb. Maybe that I should check
if
this test case works.
I will try the inmemory configuration too, because this will solve my
problems too.
Thanks for the help!

cheers,

Guido
----- Original Message -----
From: "Armin Waibel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple database problem


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Guido Beutler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Multiple database problem
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried exactly what you descibed here.
> > OJB seems to look at the default (OJB) database and not
> > on my user database.
> > Maybe this is a nes issue.
>
> there are test cases using PB-api and odmg-api to store/delete/query
> to a second database (repositoryFarAway).
> -src/test/org/apache/ojb/broker/MultipleDBTest.java
> - src/test/org/apache/ojb/odmg/MultipleDBUsageTest.java
> Maybe this could help you.
>
> >
> > I couldn find information about the in memory OJB tables.
> > Could you give me a better link to look at?
>
> Sorry, my description was imprecise. I mean you could use
> e.g. the InMemorySequenceManagerImpl (see OJB.properties)
> this implementation doesn't use the OJB_HL_SEQ table.
>
> More info you could found in shipped docs:
> call bin\build.bat doc
> to generate the all docs.
> Section 'supported platforms' describe all internal tables.
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > Guido
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Armin Waibel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:28 AM
> > Subject: Re: Multiple database problem
> >
> >
> > > Hi Guido,
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Guido Beutler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:03 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Multiple database problem
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am evaluating OJB for a project. Maybe that the decision will be
> to
> > > use a
> > > > other persistence layer than OJB so I do not want to create the
> OJB
> > > > tables at the normal production database.
> > > >It is easier to drop the
> > > > whole OJB database than to delete all the OJB tables by hand.
> > > > Currently I would like to use OJB for bean managed persistence
> with
> > > > jboss but I started with a small sample running under junit.
> > > >
> > > > Is there a way to get it working with 0.9.8 ? If I could build
> > > > some tests and OJB will be used at that project in future
> > > > I do not have a problem to create OJB Tables at the production
> > > > enviroment.
> > >
> > > OK, now I have a better understanding;-)
> > > To make it work with 0.9.8 you could try the following:
> > > - define the repositoryOJB.xml as default (set in OJB.properties)
> > > -separate the class-descriptors in a repositoryProd_user.xml file
> using
> > > a 'ENTITY link' in repositoryProd.xml.
> > > - let the default repository know about all used class-descriptors
> > > (use entity link to the repositoryProd_user.xml)
> > >
> > > It's also possible to run OJB without any intern table
> > > (see faq in shipped docs, e.g PB-api + InMemorySequenceManager).
> > >
> > > >
> > > > What is the difference with an EJB server enviroment?
> > > > Can I use the transaction layer of jboss, if yes how?
> > > Yes, you could use OJB with container-managed-tx and
> > > bean-managed-tx.
> > > (OJB was shipped with working bean examples using cm-tx,
> > > see src/ejb/org/apache/ojb/ejb).
> > > see section 'deployment' in the shipped docs for jboss integration.
> > > see build-xdoclet.xml to generate the sample beans.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > Armin
> > >
> > > >
> > > > cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Guido
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Armin Waibel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:21 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: Multiple database problem
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Guido,
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Guido Beutler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 8:14 PM
> > > > > Subject: Multiple database problem
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I tried to separate the OJB internal tables from existing
> (user
> > > data)
> > > > > > tables.
> > > > > You separate internal tables in one database and user data in
> > > another
> > > > > database?
> > > > > If so, I advise not to do that, because OJB does not support
> > > > > distributed transaction out of the box (or do you use a j2ee
> conform
> > > > > application server?).
> > > > > With next release this will be definitely not possible to do.
> Each
> > > > > database has its own OJB intern tables (if necessary).
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > > Armin
> > > > >
> > > > > > I used the faraway sample and build different repository.xml
> and
> > > > > > repository_user.xml.
> > > > > > From the log I cansee that both jdbc connections work.
> > > > > > I am executing a simple select but OJB reports that the table
> > > could
> > > > > not be
> > > > > > found.
> > > > > > Currently I think that I may have a configuration problem.
> > > > > > Is there a way to get logging information for sql statements
> and
> > > on
> > > > > which
> > > > > > connection (and database) the statement was executed by ojb?
> > > > > > I think that my statement is executed against the OJB (the
> > > default)
> > > > > database
> > > > > > and not against my user database.  How can I verify that?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > best regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Guido
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to