2009/2/21 Jérôme Beau <[email protected]>: > I posted a first version at http://rr0.org/okd/annotated > (there is no link to the page wherever except in this message to the list. I > just posted it as a web page for formating convenience).
This looks great Jérôme. Once we've got this finalized we can upload the translation to the relevant page on the http://www.opendefinition.org/ with a link back to you. > It seems to be that some errors remains in the original OKD licence, due to > elements taken from the Open Software Definition (OSD) : in the sentence of > item 9, it says that "The rights attached to the work must apply to all to > whom the *program* is redistributed". I guess the program should be replaced > by the *work*, no? Same in "closing up *software* by indirect means such as > requiring a non-disclosure agreement." where software should be replaced by > work. Hmm, these are typos in the annotated version. I think these have been corrected in the main, authoritative version at: http://www.opendefinition.org/1.0/ We have also merged the 'comments' into the main version (so the annotated version can be deprecated at some point to avoid these kind of issues). Would you mind taking a quick look at the authoritative version and checking your synced with that? Rufus _______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
