Hi Rufus, So far I haven't seen it published. Is it normal or is there something I can do to help (any other typos to fix or something) ?
With best regards, Jérôme. 2009/2/24 Rufus Pollock <[email protected]> > My french is only so-so (!) but what you've got there now definitely > looks better. We'll aim to have this up on the > http://www.opendefinition.org site soon. > > Thanks once again for all your help. > > Rufus > > 2009/2/24 Jérôme Beau <[email protected]>: > > Thanks for the feedback Rufus. > > > > I did found some differences between the autoritative version and the one > I > > used as a basis for translation. This now fixed. Feel free to let me know > if > > it looks now better to you. > > > > 2009/2/23 Rufus Pollock <[email protected]> > >> > >> 2009/2/21 Jérôme Beau <[email protected]>: > >> > I posted a first version at http://rr0.org/okd/annotated > >> > (there is no link to the page wherever except in this message to the > >> > list. I > >> > just posted it as a web page for formating convenience). > >> > >> This looks great Jérôme. Once we've got this finalized we can upload > >> the translation to the relevant page on the > >> http://www.opendefinition.org/ with a link back to you. > >> > >> > It seems to be that some errors remains in the original OKD licence, > due > >> > to > >> > elements taken from the Open Software Definition (OSD) : in the > sentence > >> > of > >> > item 9, it says that "The rights attached to the work must apply to > all > >> > to > >> > whom the *program* is redistributed". I guess the program should be > >> > replaced > >> > by the *work*, no? Same in "closing up *software* by indirect means > such > >> > as > >> > requiring a non-disclosure agreement." where software should be > replaced > >> > by > >> > work. > >> > >> Hmm, these are typos in the annotated version. I think these have been > >> corrected in the main, authoritative version at: > >> > >> http://www.opendefinition.org/1.0/ > >> > >> We have also merged the 'comments' into the main version (so the > >> annotated version can be deprecated at some point to avoid these kind > >> of issues). > >> > >> Would you mind taking a quick look at the authoritative version and > >> checking your synced with that? > >> > >> Rufus > > > > >
_______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
