> On Feb. 2, 2017, 11:38 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > i'm not sure i agree with this change, but this doesn't seem the proper way 
> > to do it, if we're going to continue searching anyways, don't send a 
> > Okular::Document::EndOfDocumentReached, just continue searching.
> 
> Elvis Angelaccio wrote:
>     Should we ask input from the usability team maybe? I find the messagebox 
> annoying because it usually gets in the way. If I trigger Next it's because I 
> have not yet found what I was looking for, so I *always* click the Continue 
> button in the messagebox.

You're reading a 20 page document, you've already read up to page 10, and then 
you decide to search for "very important thing", why would you want to wrap if 
you've already read the first 10 pages?

Anyhow sure try to get someone from usability, but comparing okular to kate is 
an apples to pineapples comparison imnsho.


- Albert


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129893/#review102350
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 1, 2017, 11:20 p.m., Elvis Angelaccio wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129893/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 1, 2017, 11:20 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular and Albert Astals Cid.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Show non-intrusive info messages whenever the search start over from the 
> beginning or the bottom of the document, instead of asking the user if s/he 
> wants to continue the search. This is consistent with search in KWrite/Kate 
> and with web browsers.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/document.h 1fd86262 
>   core/document.cpp 41b9ddfe 
>   ui/searchlineedit.cpp baac8be0 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129893/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Elvis Angelaccio
> 
>

Reply via email to