Increasing the runtime to 10 minutes was also important.  As I increased the 
number of concurrent users, if the runtime was not long enough, that metric 
would fail.


--Brian

On Thursday 12 February 2009 20:31:06 Brian Overstreet wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response.  The issue appears to be that I did not
> update the geocoder war when I updated to the latest version of the other
> components. Everything is passing now.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
> On Thursday 12 February 2009 15:19:35 Akara Sucharitakul wrote:
> > The run length might be a bit on the short side. You should run for
> > about 10 minutes.
> >
> > The updates for addAttendee and events went into svn rev 743827. This
> > seems to be later and should have the fixes. Just try a larger run time
> > and let me know whether this is resolved.
> >
> > -Akara
> >
> > Brian Overstreet wrote:
> > > On Thursday 12 February 2009 13:18:00 Akara Sucharitakul wrote:
> > >> Couple of questions:
> > >>
> > >> 1. What's the length of your run?
> > >
> > > The run length was 300 seconds after a 40 second ramp up time.
> > >
> > >> 2. Did you use a kit or built it from svn directly? (That could be
> > >> tricky to track which changes got into your build).
> > >
> > > I used revision 743894 from svn which appears to have the patch for
> > > addAttendee.php and events.php from a previous email.  The Getting
> > > Started section of the website, http://incubator.apache.org/olio/,
> > > seems to indicate that this is the preferred method of using Olio.
> > >
> > >> Generally, the larger the number of concurrent users, the higher the
> > >> number of images. Your results does not seem to indicate that. That's
> > >> why I'm worried about the changes that went in.
> > >>
> > >> -Akara
> > >>
> > >> Brian Overstreet wrote:
> > >>> I'm using the updated Olio kit from subversion, and I'm finding that
> > >>> all metrics pass except for the "Average Images on Tag Search
> > >>> Results."
> > >>>
> > >>> 1000 users = 3.42
> > >>>  800 users = 3.48
> > >>>  400 users = 3.40
> > >>>  200 users = 3.43
> > >>>  100 users = 3.60
> > >>>
> > >>> Any ideas on where I should be looking to increase this metric?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Brian

Reply via email to