On Thursday 12 February 2009 21:32:41 Akara Sucharitakul wrote:
> Hmmm, I'm wondering how the geocoder war comes into play here. But
> anyway, great you got it going.
I noticed that PHP was logging a stack trace for the missing geocoder.
[Thu Feb 12 17:20:18 2009] [error] [client 192.168.51.2] exception 'Exception'
with message 'Did not find xml part in: $stream' in
/var/apache2/2.2/htdocs/web20php2/classes/Geocoder.php:36\nStack trace:\n#0
/var/apache2/2.2/htdocs/web20php2/public_html/addEventResult.php(52):
Geocoder->__construct('7+Hz+Blvd', 'lwvrhizmwwofhq', 'UI', '97014')\n#1 {main}
This might have had some effect on performance.
>
> -Akara
>
> Brian Overstreet wrote:
> > Thanks for the quick response. The issue appears to be that I did not
> > update the geocoder war when I updated to the latest version of the other
> > components. Everything is passing now.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brian
> >
> > On Thursday 12 February 2009 15:19:35 Akara Sucharitakul wrote:
> >> The run length might be a bit on the short side. You should run for
> >> about 10 minutes.
> >>
> >> The updates for addAttendee and events went into svn rev 743827. This
> >> seems to be later and should have the fixes. Just try a larger run time
> >> and let me know whether this is resolved.
> >>
> >> -Akara
> >>
> >> Brian Overstreet wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 12 February 2009 13:18:00 Akara Sucharitakul wrote:
> >>>> Couple of questions:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. What's the length of your run?
> >>>
> >>> The run length was 300 seconds after a 40 second ramp up time.
> >>>
> >>>> 2. Did you use a kit or built it from svn directly? (That could be
> >>>> tricky to track which changes got into your build).
> >>>
> >>> I used revision 743894 from svn which appears to have the patch for
> >>> addAttendee.php and events.php from a previous email. The Getting
> >>> Started section of the website, http://incubator.apache.org/olio/,
> >>> seems to indicate that this is the preferred method of using Olio.
> >>>
> >>>> Generally, the larger the number of concurrent users, the higher the
> >>>> number of images. Your results does not seem to indicate that. That's
> >>>> why I'm worried about the changes that went in.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Akara
> >>>>
> >>>> Brian Overstreet wrote:
> >>>>> I'm using the updated Olio kit from subversion, and I'm finding that
> >>>>> all metrics pass except for the "Average Images on Tag Search
> >>>>> Results."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1000 users = 3.42
> >>>>> 800 users = 3.48
> >>>>> 400 users = 3.40
> >>>>> 200 users = 3.43
> >>>>> 100 users = 3.60
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any ideas on where I should be looking to increase this metric?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Brian
