The lack of osnet-incorporation is the problem you refer to below. But your original note was from 7/30, I think, which was three days before that problem was introduced.
? --Mark On 08/ 4/10 03:10 PM, Glenn Lagasse wrote: > * Glenn Lagasse ([email protected]) wrote: >> All, >> >> * Glenn Lagasse ([email protected]) wrote: >>> Hi Brock, >>> >>> * Brock Pytlik ([email protected]) wrote: >>>> I'm not sure why this is happening. The best way I can think of to >>>> attack this problem would be to find a package that was installed in >>>> the second image-update that wasn't in the first, then go back to >>>> the original be and install (with the -v option) that package plus >>>> entire and the other consolidations all with the explicit version >>>> listed that you expected the image-update to take you to. >>>> Presumably, that will fail and we might be able to figure out what >>>> went wrong from the output it shows. >>> >>> Ok, something really odd is going on. After struggling all day on >>> friday to try and diagnose this problem I came in yesterday and >>> magically upgrades started working the way I expected (without any code >>> changes in my workspace). After building sparc and x86 archives fresh >>> last night, today upgrades fail again. >> >> So, thanks to some help from Danek it appears that the reason my >> upgrades aren't working today is that my built ON repo doesn't contain >> an osnet-incorporation. Now, I've been doing full builds of this >> workspace using nightly with options -ACDlmprfztn and the output from >> nightly is clean (no flagged errors/warnings). When I look through the >> nightly log, I see the following for osnet-incorporation: >> >> glaga...@praetorian> grep osnet-incorporation nightly.log >> Processing synthetic manifest osnet-incorporation.mf >> Skipping dependency generation for osnet-incorporation > > Just to follow up, this turned out to be caused by 6945225 which was > fixed in 147 by 6974588. Once I updated my workspace with that change, > a rebuild and upgrade worked just as I expected them to. > > Thanks all, > > Glenn > _______________________________________________ > on-ips-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/on-ips-dev _______________________________________________ on-ips-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/on-ips-dev
