Thanks, Oliver. Absolutely got 1. Below and agreed. Didn?t get 2. Though, i.e. how every component is different when it comes to resiliency features. Ultimately, if it?s same underlying cloud infrastructure, right?
thanks & regards, Dhananjay Pavgi Mobile : +91 98220 22264 [cid:image002.png at 01CE7323.F2727500] [ONAP_logo_Sig] www.techmahindra.com<http://www.techmahindra.com/> Platinum Member. Visit : http://www.onap.org<http://www.onap.org/> From: SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) [mailto:spat...@research.att.com] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 5:04 PM To: Dhananjay Pavgi <DP00476350 at TechMahindra.com> Cc: LEFEVRE, CATHERINE <cl664y at intl.att.com>; onap-discuss at lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Support ONAP on multiple OS/Openstacks? Dhananjay, I think there are two dimensions ONAP can be improved in this regard. 1. Multi cloud support: To support multiple cloud technologies we not only have to modify the startup automation (heat template) but also adjust the components which work directly with the cloud orchestrator which are MSO, DCAE, App-C and Robotframework for every cloud technology we onboard. So to manage that effectively we should introduce a mediation layer between those 4 components and the underlying cloud technology. There are multiple options out there so that?s not something we have to build from scratch just something we have to pick and integrate. 2. The individual components are still very ?special?. What I mean with that is that each component has it?s own way to provide resilience, disaster recovery and scaling. So if you want to scale out or fail over e.g. the SDN-C controller you do something different then when you scale out DCAE etc? Those difference are visible on the cloud layer which makes this more difficult then it has to be. So we should figure out how to make this more homogeneous. Oliver On Apr 20, 2017, at 4:53 AM, Dhananjay Pavgi <DP00476350 at TechMahindra.com<mailto:DP00476350 at TechMahindra.com>> wrote: Fully agree, Catherine. In addition, should we also consider making ONAP agnostic of underlying virtualization layer e.g. OpenStack, VmWare, OpenVIM etc . Ideally, if cloud native approach is used then this should be taken care of. thanks & regards, Dhananjay Pavgi Mobile : +91 98220 22264 <image001.png> <image002.jpg> www.techmahindra.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.techmahindra.com_&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=9iyuArzgyekj47PZSPfIijI2cSHsUJtAlcTA0X_udNI&m=qY5ElmRuugbIVM9UQVmuBI0vRH_tUKCg0HoRrqxrF2I&s=1yNUJKatHXXDvoRmPtigT-ey1sVtGVIVilkKUH7w9JU&e=> Platinum Member. Visit : http://www.onap.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.onap.org_&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=9iyuArzgyekj47PZSPfIijI2cSHsUJtAlcTA0X_udNI&m=qY5ElmRuugbIVM9UQVmuBI0vRH_tUKCg0HoRrqxrF2I&s=nxL8tQrJ68d4Vg2TdSyRE-2cVoOgnc3SyZhebtGK40w&e=> From: onap-discuss-bounces at lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-bounces at lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Lefevre, Catherine Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 2:11 PM To: onap-discuss at lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss at lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-discuss] Support ONAP on multiple OS/Openstacks? Good morning all, I would like to start a new thread in order to understand if there is a need to certify ONAP on multiple OS/Openstacks. OS Currently ONAP is running on Ubuntu 14.04 (target to move to Ubuntu 16.04). Open-O is running on CentOS but I understand from Helen Yunxia (Huawei) that it should not be an issue to run it on Ubuntu. Redhat was not considered from a certification perspective due to license cost.
