Sent again after subscribing to the "onap-discuss" group.

Regards,
Piyush

From: Piyush Garg
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 6:30 PM
To: 'Seshu m' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' 
<[email protected]>
Cc: Anand Sankaran <[email protected]>; Amit Sinha <[email protected]>
Subject: SO High availability environment deployment

Hi All,

We are working for Bell Canada and currently designing a solution for SO high 
availability deployment. Mainly the purpose is to avoid a single point of 
failure in the setup.
For this we are thinking to replicate the pods (using Kubernetes replicas) of 
all the business critical components those are used during the flow execution. 
For example: in two nodes kubernetes cluster, replicate the pods as mentioned 
in the below list:

Pod

Replica Count

so

2

so-bpmn-infra

2

so-catalog-db-adapter

2

so-openstack-adapter

2

so-request-db-adapter

2

so-sdnc-adapter

2

so-vfc-adapter

2

so-mariadb

1

so-monitoring

1

so-sdc-controller

1


Clustering for MariaDB can be addressed separately with the MariaDB Galera 
Cluster. For "so-monitoring" and "so-sdc-controller", we can skip the 
replication as they are not used during the flow execution.

If we exclude the use case of failure during the in-flight request, do you 
think this will be sufficient for SO HA deployment or we need to consider 
something else too ? or if there is any other clustering solution you are aware 
of ?

Regards,
Piyush
This email and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential 
and subject to the Amdocs Email Terms of Service, which you may review at 
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-terms-of-service 
<https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-terms-of-service>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15727): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15727
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/30034205/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to