+1 Ed
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 8:14 AM, SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) < spatsch at research.att.com> wrote: > > Dear TSC, > > I think we have a little conundrum with the current code base repos. As > you are likely aware the original code base we had released was matching > our 1610 internal release. We have been busy the last few weeks uploading > the delta to bring the public code base up to the current internal version > to give the community the same view/code we use today. Now it turns out > that our current internal code base requires some additional ?sub-repos? 3 > under A&AI and one under SDC. Without those repos we can not complete the > public code update by 5/5 as originally promised. > > The conundrum now is that we still don?t have a charter and no projects > have been created yet. So there is no process for us to create those > additional repos on LF servers. > > Therefore, I am requesting a one time waiver from the TSC allowing the LF > to create those repos so we can complete the code base update in a timely > manor. > > I don?t really think there is any substantial risk as the TSC can always > decide to delete the repos again later if the TSC doesn?t like them. On the > positive side it allows the community to see all the code in a timely manor. > > To be clear those are nor new functional components. Those repos only > include improvements to the existing functional components in particular > A&AI and SDC. > > Thx > > Oliver > _______________________________________________ > ONAP-TSC mailing list > ONAP-TSC at lists.onap.org > https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-tsc/attachments/20170426/5c394809/attachment.html>
