+1 

make sense, please go ahead!


> On Apr 26, 2017, at 9:34 AM, Ed Warnicke <hagbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> Ed
> 
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 8:14 AM, SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) <spatsch at 
> research.att.com <mailto:spatsch at research.att.com>> wrote:
> 
> Dear TSC,
> 
> I think we have a little conundrum with the current code base repos. As you 
> are likely aware the original code base we had released was matching our 1610 
> internal release. We have been busy the last few weeks uploading the delta to 
> bring the public code base up to the current internal version to give the 
> community the same view/code we use today. Now it turns out that our current 
> internal code base requires some additional ?sub-repos? 3 under A&AI and one 
> under SDC. Without those repos we can not complete the public code update by 
> 5/5 as originally promised.
> 
> The conundrum now is that we still don?t have a charter and no projects have 
> been created yet. So there is no process for us to create those additional 
> repos on LF servers.
> 
> Therefore, I am requesting a one time waiver from the TSC allowing the LF to 
> create those repos so we can complete the code base update in a timely manor.
> 
> I don?t really think there is any substantial risk as the TSC can always 
> decide to delete the repos again later if the TSC doesn?t like them. On the 
> positive side it allows the community to see all the code in a timely manor.
> 
> To be clear those are nor new functional components. Those repos only include 
> improvements to the existing functional components in particular A&AI and SDC.
> 
> Thx
> 
> Oliver
> _______________________________________________
> ONAP-TSC mailing list
> ONAP-TSC at lists.onap.org <mailto:ONAP-TSC at lists.onap.org>
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc 
> <https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ONAP-TSC mailing list
> ONAP-TSC at lists.onap.org
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-tsc/attachments/20170426/6da52de7/attachment.html>

Reply via email to