Hi Phil,

Thanks for putting forward a recommendation. I support your suggested approach.

Regards, Frank

From: Phil Robb [mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Dienstag, 23. Januar 2018 14:16
To: CHAWKI Jamil IMT/OLN <jamil.cha...@orange.com>
Cc: Stephen Terrill <stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>; Frank Brockners (fbrockne) 
<fbroc...@cisco.com>; GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) <ma...@research.att.com>; Alla 
Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com>; Gadiyar, Rajesh <rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>; 
onap-tsc@lists.onap.org P <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>; 
onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP 
Representative to the LFN TAC

Hello All:

I appreciate everyone's thoughtful discussion on the topic.

This may be anecdotal evidence, but I note that OPNFV, and FD.io, who both 
still have TSCs populated by Platinum Designates chose to have the TSC Chair be 
the TAC representative (our option #1), while ODL, who has a fully 
community-elected TSC chose to allow any Committer to self-nominate and run 
(our option #3).  I have noticed that the ODL TSC, since being fully elected, 
often leans toward the broadest, most inclusive election process for most 
decisions.  I believe they assume that in the end the community will make the 
right choice if given the opportunity to choose.. including electing the TSC 
Chair for the TAC position if he/she runs for it... after all, the person got 
elected to the highest position within the project by the same method.

For ONAP, it may make sense to have Mazin fill the TAC representative role as 
TSC Chair (since he has indicated he is willing and able) until after the 
Beijing release.  Once we elect a new TSC post Beijing, let's give them the 
opportunity to discuss and agree upon the best way to populate the TAC Rep. for 
ONAP going forward from there.

If that idea resonates with the TSC, then I suggest we put a vote up for that 
during the TSC meeting this week.  ONAP is the last to decide their method, and 
I would like to get the first TAC meeting scheduled ASAP.

Best,

Phil.



On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:29 PM, 
<jamil.cha...@orange.com<mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com>> wrote:
Hello
I agree with Steve that we need  to select an option. Phil do you have a 
proposal for selection?
Best
Jamil

Le 22 janv. 2018 à 23:45, Stephen Terrill 
<stephen.terr...@ericsson.com<mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>> a écrit :
Hi,

Originally there were three proposals put on the table, have we settled on that:

  1.  Just have the TSC Chair represent ONAP in the TAC
  2.  Have the TSC vote for some TSC member to represent ONAP in the TAC
  3.  Have the Committers vote for some Committer-At-Large to represent ONAP in 
the TAC
It sounds like we are settling on #2 but there were also voices for #1.

One approach is that after a TSC chair election and subsequent appointment, 
allow the TSC chair to decide to follow #1 or delegate it to the TSC #2 for 
that year.  If we were to agree with that, we should apply the same principle 
from now.

BR,

Steve

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
Sent: 19 January 2018 08:11
To: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) 
<ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>; Alla Goldner 
<alla.gold...@amdocs.com<mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com>>; Gadiyar, Rajesh 
<rajesh.gadi...@intel.com<mailto:rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>>; Phil Robb 
<pr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Cc: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>; 
onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> P 
<onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP 
Representative to the LFN TAC

Thanks Mazin. Appreciated. IMHO it would be great if the TAC representative 
would also be part of the TSC.
Would it make sense to reassess the TAC representation post the composition of 
the a new TSC?

Thanks, Frank

From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:ma...@research.att.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 18. Januar 2018 19:03
To: Frank Brockners (fbrockne) <fbroc...@cisco.com<mailto:fbroc...@cisco.com>>; 
Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com<mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com>>; 
Gadiyar, Rajesh <rajesh.gadi...@intel.com<mailto:rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>>; 
Phil Robb <pr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> P 
<onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>; 
onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP 
Representative to the LFN TAC

Team,

I am happy to represent ONAP at TAC for one year. A new ONAP chair will need to 
be selected post Beijing release
so I will be stepping down as a Chair.

If there are several candidates who would like to represent ONAP at TAC then I 
suggest we go for a vote.
Phil can help us to start a nomination and voting process.

Mazin



On Jan 18, 2018, at 7:27 AM, Frank Brockners (fbrockne) 
<fbroc...@cisco.com<mailto:fbroc...@cisco.com>> wrote:

Given that during the transition period into the LFN structure some continuity 
would make sense, #1 would be the straight-forward choice, assuming that Mazin 
has the cycles (Mazin, any thoughts?). Once we move to a newly composed TSC in 
May, we could also re-assess the question how we’d choose the TAC 
representative for ONAP.
BTW/ - several other communities, .e.g. FD.io<http://FD.io> and OPNFV went with 
the same approach – i.e. have the TSC chair also be the TAC representative.

Regards, Frank

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018 21:41
To: Phil Robb <pr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
Gadiyar, Rajesh <rajesh.gadi...@intel.com<mailto:rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>>
Cc: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>; 
onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP 
Representative to the LFN TAC

Yes.

Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


<image001.png>

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 9:24 PM
To: Gadiyar, Rajesh <rajesh.gadi...@intel.com<mailto:rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>>
Cc: onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>; 
onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP 
Representative to the LFN TAC

Hello Rajesh and Alla:

Just so I'm clear on your +1s, you are agreeing with Jason's comment, with a 
preference for #1 unless the TSC Chair does not want to sign up for the 
responsibility, in which case we move to #2?

Best,

Phil.

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Gadiyar, Rajesh 
<rajesh.gadi...@intel.com<mailto:rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>> wrote:
+1

From: <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>> 
on behalf of Jason Hunt <djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com>>
Date: Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 9:38 AM
To: Dhananjay Pavgi 
<dp00476...@techmahindra.com<mailto:dp00476...@techmahindra.com>>
Cc: "onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>" 
<onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>>, 
onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>

Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP 
Representative to the LFN TAC

#1 makes the most sense to me, but if Mazin feels it's too much for the chair 
to take on, #2 is a fine backup option.


Regards,
Jason Hunt
Executive Software Architect, IBM

Phone: 314-749-7422<tel:(314)%20749-7422>
Email: djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com>
Twitter: @DJHunt




From:        Dhananjay Pavgi 
<dp00476...@techmahindra.com<mailto:dp00476...@techmahindra.com>>
To:        "HU, BIN" <bh5...@att.com<mailto:bh5...@att.com>>, Phil Robb 
<pr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>>, onap-tsc 
<onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>
Date:        01/11/2018 11:00 AM
Subject:        Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate        the     
   ONAP        Representative to the LFN TAC
Sent by:        
onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>
________________________________



Support Option 1; as TSC Chair for a particular stream has broader 360 view of 
the program including roadmap, priorities etc.

thanks & regards,
Dhananjay Pavgi
+91 98220 22264<tel:+91%2098220%2022264>

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of HU, BIN
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 10:24 PM
To: Phil Robb <pr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP 
Representative to the LFN TAC

Just FYI:
-          OPNFV TSC voted on Tuesday (Jan 9) to have TSC Chair to represent 
OPNFV in TAC
-          
fd.io<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__fd.io&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=uUqkai-oDagZ8hOehvNeq4xhgmc00SxBx44BoHLJkAQ&s=5N0D5NVoJPZgCWcOj7AYXS9wxcMbdfcIO-cdCKy-tbw&e=>
 voted the same today to have TSC Chair represent 
fd.io<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__fd.io&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=uUqkai-oDagZ8hOehvNeq4xhgmc00SxBx44BoHLJkAQ&s=5N0D5NVoJPZgCWcOj7AYXS9wxcMbdfcIO-cdCKy-tbw&e=>
 in TAC, if I am not mistaken.

Option 1 is used by both of our sister communities under the same LFN.

Just an FYI.

Thanks
Bin

From: 
onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
 On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 7:08 AM
To: onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP Representative 
to the LFN TAC

Hello ONAP TSC Members:

Now that ONAP is a part of the Linux Foundation Networking (LFN) Directed Fund, 
we need to decide how we are going to populate our ONAP Representative in the 
LFN Technical Advisory Council (TAC).

As a reminder, the Scope of the responsibilities of the TAC are:
=====
•Scope of responsibility
•Recommend acceptance or removal of projects under the Umbrella to be approved 
by the Governing Board
•Focus on activities that drive collaboration and integration across projects 
(e.g. collaborative development, testing, etc)
•Elected TAC Chair provides guidance to Governing Board on investment needs of 
the project communities

=====

Some of the options for us to populate our representative include:
1) Just have the TSC Chair represent ONAP in the TAC
2) Have the TSC vote for some TSC member to represent ONAP in the TAC
3) Have the Committers vote for some Committer-At-Large to represent ONAP in 
the TAC
... etc.

I will be setting up the first TAC meeting to occur somewhere in the last third 
of January and it would be good for the ONAP community to have representation 
from the start.

I personally lean toward option #2 because a) it does not by default put more 
burden on the TSC Chair unless they choose to run for the position, and b) 
having the representative come from the TSC ensures that our representative is 
up to speed on all TSC conversations that have occurred.  However, I certainly 
believe the other options are viable as well.

Given our tight schedule during TSC meetings in the coming weeks, it would be 
nice if we can come to a decision on this topic via email.  Please respond with 
your thoughts and opinions and based on the feedback received, I'll try to put 
together a vote on this topic in about a week.

Thanks,

Phil.
--
Phil Robb
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949<tel:(970)%20229-5949>
(M) 970-420-4292<tel:(970)%20420-4292>
Skype: Phil.Robb
============================================================================================================================
Disclaimer:  This message and the information contained herein is proprietary 
and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may 
review the policy at 
http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.techmahindra.com_Disclaimer.html&d=DwMGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=xpb9iDaHZ3rFPDWWGLuq3g2AEaY4_V7LmX4ofC3h2c8&s=30ogMKHKBS9IsAwXSpwA14AW2fegZs1niPDeEYb-pxI&e=>externally
 
http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tim.techmahindra.com_tim_disclaimer.html&d=DwMGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=xpb9iDaHZ3rFPDWWGLuq3g2AEaY4_V7LmX4ofC3h2c8&s=raYJ1oNjvFg-1p7C7F2LfU4YNFjw1yHSBejxhQuwfes&e=>internally
 within TechMahindra.
============================================================================================================================_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=xpb9iDaHZ3rFPDWWGLuq3g2AEaY4_V7LmX4ofC3h2c8&s=Rj707DwdiZ15hmPuDPNts-w6YrmXMiWMBDuvzGn82ow&e=


_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=uUqkai-oDagZ8hOehvNeq4xhgmc00SxBx44BoHLJkAQ&s=caN8Fd1iXDo242StlX-PoMPBQ-P-xAH4EcwaL5mvwOs&e=>



--
Phil Robb
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949<tel:(970)%20229-5949>
(M) 970-420-4292<tel:(970)%20420-4292>
Skype: Phil.Robb
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at 
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=uUqkai-oDagZ8hOehvNeq4xhgmc00SxBx44BoHLJkAQ&s=QOdEQwmHwndtEVwQDLIEb91wnvD9AGsdlJW6wn-Xw0o&e=>
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=uUqkai-oDagZ8hOehvNeq4xhgmc00SxBx44BoHLJkAQ&s=caN8Fd1iXDo242StlX-PoMPBQ-P-xAH4EcwaL5mvwOs&e=

_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.



--
Phil Robb
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to