To avoid branding issues and the rules for incubators, I favor the simplified wording without "Apache" if that works. That is, Andy Brown's suggested
"OpenOffice.org and related products" (assuming we are still talking about material accessed via *.openoffice.org and not *.apache.org) Pointing to "Apache OpenOffice.org (incubator)" then makes sense as one of those related products. This can be adjusted over time, first when we have our first podling releases, and then when we become a Top-Level Project (TLP). There are many miles to travel, rivers to ford, oceans to cross. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Ingrid von der Mehden [mailto:ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 05:04 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Migrating the web forums at user.services.openoffice.org to Apache servers Am 08.08.2011 02:01, schrieb Rob Weir: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Andy Brown<a...@the-martin-byrd.net> wrote: >> [ ... ] >> Would it not be more accurate to say "OpenOffice.org and related products"? >> At this time there is no Apache OpenOffice.org to be related to. Even >> Apache OpenOffice.org will be one of those "related products". >> > > My understanding of Apache Branding Requirements is that we only need > to use the full name the first time it is used on the page. So title = > "Apache OpenOffice.org Support Forum" and subtitle = "User community > support forum for OpenOffice.org and related products" would be fine. > +1 to this suggestion for the forum header. It is inviting and gives equal rights to all flavors of OpenOffice.org. Ingrid
