By "we" I meant anyone who is seen, over there, as representing the Apache ooo project or is reporting on the fate of oo.o as viewed from the Apache ooo project. There's a lot of sensitivity over there, probably more than we have seen expressed here.
Please go ahead. I have the bugzilla announcement in my job jar and I'm still looking for who on oo.o can provide administrative support on the oo.o end so that the bits don't rot. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 08:03 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Should w merge discuss@ooo into ooo-users.i.a.o ? On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: > I agree that participants on discuss@oo.o should be invited to come to > ooo-users@i.a.o. > > Can we be more diplomatic in our announcements over there? The one at > users@oo.o on creation of the ooo-users@i.a.o list did not go over very well > and was a lightning rod for some vocal participants there. > If by "we" you mean that you are volunteering to send a notification to discuss@oo.o, then go for it. Otherwise, I will do it. -Rob
