+1 On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au>wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 8:17 AM > > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal > > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Gavin McDonald > > <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 2:52 AM > > >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal > > >> > > >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > > >> <orc...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for > > >> > the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the > > >> > OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. > > >> > The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page > > >> > > > >> > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integra > > >> t > > >> e+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project>. > > >> > > > >> > The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 > > >> > hours from now. > > >> > > > >> > A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of > > >> > the proposal. > > >> > > > >> > [ ] +1 approve > > >> > [ ] 0 abstain > > >> > [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> +0, which does not means "abstain" but means I have no objections, > > >> +but > > >> do not volunteer to help with the migration. > > > > > > It means abstain if the vote says so. Nobody is volunteering to do > > > anything when they vote, they are approving, or not, or no opinion. > > > All those people giving their +1 are not also offering to help with > > > the migration, but saying with a positive vote that it should happen. > > > Stop being so obtuse please and go with the flow a bit more to let > > > things happen. Guidance is appreciated I'm sure, but don't throttle. > > > > > > > The attentive reader would note that I did not vote "0". I voted "+0". > My > > vote means exactly what I say it means, nothing more, nothing less. > > I read exactly what you wrote, do not think I am not attentive. > > Your arrogance around here lately is beyond belief, pack it in > > > > > > > > -Rob > > > > > Gav... > > > > > >> > > >> -Rob > > >> > > >> > GUIDELINES > > >> > > > >> > ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are > > >> those > > >> > cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate > > >> > message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the > > >> > last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote > > >> > from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the > > >> > ooo-dev > > >> list with this subject are not counted. > > >> > > > >> > DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the > > >> > votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other > > >> > discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with > > >> > anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with > > >> > subject beginning > > >> [VOTE][DISCUSS]. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > - Dennis E. Hamilton > > >> > tools for document interoperability, <http://nfoWorks.org/> > > >> > dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com
