On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hmm ... >> We have discussed some of the things that must be replaced but we have not >> drawn a roadmap about it beyond the initial migration list. I think we will >> have to open BZ issues for those. >> >> The gtk/qt issue is rather critcal: I do not think there is previous history >> among Apache projects depending on them but if we cannot consider those >> "system provided" libraries it would be a serious setback to an early Apache >> release. > > I would support allowing C/C++ code to link to gtk and/or qt, provided > we don't distribute gtk or qt themselves. Both are LGPL. The LGPL is > clear for languages like C, C++. >
Clear in what sense? Dynamic linking and such? >> Pedro. >
