2012/3/13 Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@googlemail.com> > On 3/12/12 11:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Andrew Rist<andrew.r...@oracle.com>** >> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> On 3/12/2012 9:14 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> 2012/3/12 Jürgen >>> Schmidt<jogischmidt@**googlema**il.com<http://googlemail.com> >>>> <jogischmidt@googlemail.**com <jogischm...@googlemail.com>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots >>>>> based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is >>>>> not >>>>> the latest working buildbot revision but I would like to include an >>>>> increased buildid. >>>>> >>>>> Hi Juergen-- >>>>> >>>> >>>> Could someone at some point enlighten us as to WHY the latest revisions >>>> aren't automatically scooped up by the buildbot? >>>> >>>> The build bots pull the latest code every night. >>> >>> Or amybe a wiki page on >>> >>>> this??? I also notice that the Linux-32 build via buildbot still has >>>> issues, and wonder, why, if changes have been successfully made to this >>>> build AND supposedly it's being built by Ubuntu (same as the developer >>>> builds), it still has issues. >>>> >>>> The Linux-32 build bot is on Ubuntu 11.10 (as opposed to 10.04). There >>> are issues related to building on the newer Ubuntu. >>> We've been working through them, but there is one issue left with symbols >>> in CoinMP. I have not had time to work through that issue. >>> >>> >> Andrew--Thanks for the clarification. I was confused by the wording in >> Juergen's message somehow...I thought what you are saying was the case. >> >> >> sorry for the confusion. > > I think our long term goal is to use the build bots to build binary > versions that are identical to our binary releases as well. > > And as Ariel has pointed out for this specific builds we need some > baseline systems that are not typically the latest and greatest ;-) >
So what do you suggest? Can "virtual" builbots be established for "older" OSes, and for which ones? I don't know what is causing the problem with Ubuntu 11.10 as opposed to 10.04. Is it a very non-standard (library) change by Ubuntu that might continue in the future? Should we switch to a more "generic" Linux buildbot? I don't have any suggestions. I'm just thinking... > The Oracle release engineers put a lot of effort in keeping a stable > baseline to ensure that the builds work on as many as possible systems. You > can't it compare to build versions for a special distro. > > And of course it would be ideal if the Linux distros would include AOO > over time in their distro and would build it based on the source releases. > > Juergen > > >>> (I am wondering if CoinMP is deployed on the system - outside of the >>> build >>> tree - when it is compiled. If so a version using a different set of g++ >>> and ld may be on the system, and blocking it from being rebuilt.) >>> >>> Anyway - it is down to the last four packages, and 'almost' builds ;-) >>> >>> >>> >>> I confess I know NOTHING about the buildbot, >>> >>>> so if you can point me (and others) to some instructions that might be >>>> helpful. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/****openoffice/buildlogs/**linux32/**<http://ci.apache.org/projects/**openoffice/buildlogs/linux32/**> >>> log/unxlngi6.pro.build.html<ht**tp://ci.apache.org/projects/** >>> openoffice/buildlogs/linux32/**log/unxlngi6.pro.build.html<http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux32/log/unxlngi6.pro.build.html> >>> > >>> >>> that shows the latest set of logs >>> >>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/****openoffice-linux32-nightly<http://ci.apache.org/builders/**openoffice-linux32-nightly> >>> <h**ttp://ci.apache.org/builders/**openoffice-linux32-nightly<http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly> >>> > >>> >>> shows the latest builds - click on a build and you can see the set of >>> steps it goes through. >>> >>> >> Right, yes...I've looked at these. I need to learn more about the setup >> (inclusions etc) we have setup FOR the build as there appears to be >> several >> options. But I will explore on my own for the time being. Thanks again for >> this response. I would like to help with building but haven't had the >> time >> to it so far. >> >> >> >> >>> A. >>> >>> >>>> Thanks for everything! :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> It is still no a official RC because of the existing show stopper >>>> issues. >>>> >>>>> I hope that we can start a second build later this week if possible. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to propose also that we continue to provide >>>>> normal/complete >>>>> install sets for all languages. >>>>> >>>>> The dev snapshot from last week was proposed to the IPMC with zero >>>>> response so far. Not really promising and maybe somebody else has an >>>>> idea >>>>> what we can do to get some early feedback. >>>>> >>>>> The builds will be made available again under >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/** >>>>> confluence/display/OOOUSERS/******AOO+3.4+Unofficial+**Developer+*** >>>>> *Snapshots<https://cwiki.**apa**che.org/confluence/display/**<http://apache.org/confluence/display/**> >>>>> OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+****Developer+Snapshots<https://** >>>>> cwiki.apache.org/confluence/**display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+** >>>>> Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots> >>>>> **> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Juergen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> >>> Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect >>> OracleCorporate Architecture Group >>> Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847 >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Follow your bliss." -- attributed to Joseph Campbell
