----- Original Message ----- > From: Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Mark Ramm <m...@geek.net>; Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 3:07 PM > Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution > > > On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:33 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Mark Ramm <m...@geek.net> >>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer > <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> >>> Cc: Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:25 PM >>> Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Joe Schaefer > <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> FWIW the ballpark figures we have today Roberto >>>> >>>> are roughly 12GB worth of release artifacts and >>>> >>>> about100TB / day worth of download traffic. >>> >>> Thanks for the information. >>> >>> I'm working with Roberto to make sure all the right technical >>> resources are aligned behind him, and that we have the resources to >>> provide a great experience to your users. So, I'm here to help out, >>> and validate everything to make sure we are prepared to handle > AOO's >>> peak load. >>> >>> Based on the file size data in the previous e-mail, and this bandwidth >>> information, I believe we are talking about something around 700k >>> download per day. >>> >>> Is that peak load, or is that sustained load? If it's sustained, do >>> you have any ideas about what peak load would look like? If not, do >>> you have any ideas about what sustained load would look like? >> >> >> Up until the Update service broke last week, ooo was sustaining 300K >> downloads a day. We used a ballpark download figure of 300 MB per user, >> which may explain the discrepancy if you used something considerably less. >> >> >> We simply don't have any data at this point about peak load to make >> any educated guesses. > > When this subject came up last year Marcus described peak as 300,000 > downloads / > day. > > Stats were collected until last February's switch to Kenai. See > http://www.openoffice.org/marketing/marketing_bouncer.html
Ah no. If you bother to compute any stats based on the download figures, you will see that 300K is an average daily figure, not a peak one. Please don't second-guess the infra people, we actually care about the details here ;-). > > Depending on how we handle the announcement of AOO 3.4 - press, update > service, > and ooo-announce we might be able to spread a single spike into more smaller > peaks. > > HTH, > Dave > >> >> >>> >>> And finally: would you have any objection to us using a mix of fixed >>> mirrors, elastic file delivery services (like s3), and commercial CDN >>> service to handle spikes in download gracefully and assure that global >>> users get good download performance when local mirrors are overloaded >>> or not available? >> >> >> No, we may even be willing to budget some amount for this purpose. >> Cost estimates would be appreciated as our budget numbers for FY2012 >> need to be finalized next week. >> >> >>> >>> I'm looking forward to working with all of you to make sure that > users >>> have a reliable and fast download source for the upcoming Apache Open >>> Office release. Let me know if there's any questions I can answer >>> for you, or anything else I can do to help. >>> >>> --Mark Ramm >>> ==== >>> This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. > It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the > intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution > or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If > you > have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by > replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from > your > system. Thank you. >>> >>> >>> >>> >
