--- Mar 3/4/12, eric b <eric.bach...@free.fr> ha scritto: > > > Your patches are very straightforward but .. heck, we > are so near the release I personally won't run risks. > > > > > Ok no problem. Thanks for the attachment on the issue. > anyway. >
Well, if it builds we should consider it. Your original patch had a small problem: You removed the if HAS_HUNSPELL flag that some of us use for the preinstalled hunspell. On FreeBSD we are using 1.3.2 (shared with LO). Something cosmetical is that I like to keep the patches without version number (hunspell.patch instead of hunspell-1.3.1.patch) because it's useful to review in SVN how the patch has changed. > My intention was simply to provide a fast answer. I'll try > to do some cleanup today, build and test it, and to provide > a better patch. Just in case, I added more information to > Simon (on this list), and if someone else will try, she or > he's welcome > And big thanks ... it was indeed a fast answer! Pedro.
