On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > Il 15/04/2012 18:16, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >> Follow the process. If you want to >> propose it as a release blocker then edit the BZ issue and set the 3.4 >> release blocker flag to "?". > > > But I had followed the process, right? Just before posting here I had set > the flag. I see it correctly at > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119208 >
That looks good. Thanks. > If anything is still missing, I'll be happy to conform, so long as we don't > exaggerate with formality and we don't change the focus of our discussions > to formal details rather than the real issues. > I agree that we don't want more formality than necessary. But a consistent way of indicating blocking issues is needed so we can focusing on them, find them consistently in BZ queries, etc. > By the way, if we have up-to-date documentation on the QA process I'd > appreciate being pointed to it; so far I clearly adopted a partially old > process, so things that were obvious to me (since I had classified the issue > as P2) might not be obvious to you. > There are bits and pieces on the mailing list. We should update it once we have a release. I think we'll want to update a few things. > Regards, > Andrea.
