On May 7, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 05/07/2012 08:27 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Juergen Schmidt<jogischm...@googlemail.com >>> wrote: >> >>> On Monday, 7. May 2012 at 18:33, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >>>> <jogischm...@googlemail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/7/12 5:32 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Andrea Pescetti<pesce...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06/05/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's much improved now, but it seems we still miss several files >>> unless >>>>>>>> the upload is still ongoing. ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_****3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-**** >>>>>>>> deb_LG.tar.gz >>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_****3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-**** >>>>>>>> rpm_LG.tar.gz >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> for virtually all values of LG (ar, cs, de and so on). >>>>>>> All files listed in >>>>>>> >>> http://www.openoffice.org/****download/test/checksums_new_****dl.html< >>> http://www.openoffice.org/**download/test/checksums_new_**dl.html> >>>>>>> <http://www.openoffice. >>> **org/download/test/checksums_**new_dl.html< >>> http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/checksums_new_dl.html> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> are now available. So now there shouldn't be any missing files any >>>>>>> longer. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> OK, thanks for this...the "official" checksums file should now be >>> living >>>>>> in >>>>>> >>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/checksums/** >>>>>> 3.4.0_checksums.html< >>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/checksums/3.4.0_checksums.html >>>> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> I need tomake sure this is the most recent version before moving on. >>>>>> >>>>>> And, I do think this needed its own page... >>>>> you mean the checksums have to be on a separate page? Why? Why make it >>> so >>>>> complicate? I don't understand the reason. >>>>> >>>>> Pleas explain it to me, I am eager to learn ;-) >>>> >>>> I can't really give you an explanation except to say this is how it was >>>> done in the past. The current checksums page is quite large...they COULD >>> be >>>> tacked on to other.html I guess, but it just seems cleaner this >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> well a lot of room for improvements. The pages with the centered tables >>> with different widths looks of course not really professional or what do >>> others think? > > It's not that bad I guess. But sure it would go better. > > I've also realized that there are no bullet points display when doing a list > with <ul> or <ol>.
Probably needs some css magic. >>> I really hope we can revamp the whole page in the future. A cleaner, >>> simpler design. Consistent translated content with a modern fresh design ;-) > > Sure. However, this needs time. An expert can do it maybe in less time. But > I'm just a little volunteer in his spare time that has less knowledge with > HTML/CSS/JS than you with the AOO source code and full time. ;-) > >> I understand. But, I think Marcus did a GREAT job with this in the time we >> had to get this going. A LOT of work really... >> >> We do have a lot of changes and considerations for the future -- no >> disagreement from me there. Mock-ups would be appreciated. :) > > Or some links to other websites as reference. These can be on the wiki that Kay will make. There is a whole range. I suspect that there is some hovering magic we can do, but perhaps simple is best. Our users don't always have a lot of bandwidth. More in coming weeks. Great work Marcus, Kay and Jürgen and others! Regards, Dave Regards, Dave > > Marcus
