Hi,
On 01.06.2012 11:05, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
On 31.05.2012 18:46, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
[snip]
Ok.
Roberto, Rob and Kay are in favor to activate the update service only for
a
part of the possible OOo 3.3 instances in order to check, if the traffic
can
be handled. No objections from my side.
One important remark which I had not given yet:
When we had the redirect from [5] to [4] established by the ASF
infrastructure team, all (yes, all) installed OOo 3.3 instances in which
the
check of updates is initiated will get the XML document. Whose which find
an
entry with their data (language, platform, architecture) will state that
an
update is available. All the others will state that the OOo 3.3
installation
is up to date.
Clear.
To start this first phase the following tasks need to be finished:
(1) Choose the OOo 3.3 candidates for the first phase.
-- orw's proposal: italian on all four platforms
agree
(2) Get in contact with the ASF infrastructure team to get the redirect
established at a certain day.
-- orw is volunteering for this task
(3) Fill the landing page [6] with content and links and activate
tracking
for this page.
-- at least one volunteer is needed here.
I can volunteer for this, do we have a draft text for that?
No, there is no draft.
But Rob suggested in his reply to provide links to the corresponding NL
pages. Andrea second it and I am also in favor of it. It would save us some
resources.
agree
The needed updates to the NL pages have to be done nevertheless in my
opinion.
Andrea are you going to do that or do you want me to do so?
Rob already made a corresponding investigation and started a thread here [1].
As far as I can see from this thread the italian NL pages is in a good shape.
[1] http://ooo-dev.markmail.org/thread/7ydafrdrqxpctsy3
Best regards, Oliver.
