Hi Raphael It's real a great news for us. Thanks for your effort.
2012/8/8 Raphael Bircher <rbirc...@apache.org> > Hi Ji Yan > > In this case I have good news. Not from side of Apache Infrastructure, > but Adfinis SyGroup AG offer us a sponsored webspace for it. If all goes > right, I will get access today, and then I can install it. But I will > open a separate thread for it. > > Greetings Raphael > > Am 08.08.12 07:55, schrieb Ji Yan: > > Update the page with my JIRA issue > > INFRA-5072<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5072> > > > > 2012/8/8 Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> > > > >> Am 08/07/2012 10:56 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir<robw...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> I was trying to track down the status of some JIRA issues we had > >>>> related to Pootle. It was harder than expected to find. This is > >>>> partially because in JIRA the issues are not sortable/searchable by > >>>> the submitting project, but only by the submitting individual. So the > >>>> issues of interest to me were submitted by various people, Juergen, > >>>> Oliver, etc. > >>>> > >>>> So to make this easier for me next time, and for anyone else, I > >>>> created a table on the wiki of our open Infrastructure JIRA issues: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** > >>>> Open+Infrastructure+Requests< > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Open+Infrastructure+Requests > > > >>>> > >>>> This might be useful as well as a way for us, as a project, to > >>>> prioritize which issues we think are more urgent. I've suggested > >>>> some initial ratings. Feel free to modify. Also, feel free to add > >>>> any other open issues. > >>>> > >>>> Finally, was there a JIRA issue related to code signing? If so I was > >>>> not able to to find it. > >>>> > >>>> -Rob > >>>> > >>>> > >>> This is good. Maybe we should make a note to ourselves to always > include > >>> "AOO" in the title to make these easier to find in the future. I don't > >>> think I've been consistent in this regard but I think it would help. > >>> > >> OK, to have a unique identifier in the title instead of the "Labels" > field > >> is also working. ;-) > >> > >> Marcus > >> > > > > > > -- Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji
