On 17/09/2012 Andrew Rist wrote:
* This is not a vote. This is a search for consensus. Please no '-1' replies. Let's see what this process produces, and then discuss from there.
It seems that the process is working quite well, and that we are on the right way to bootstrap a PMC by consensus.
I surely don't want to block the current process, but I wonder if allowing people to "vote" (actually, express preferences) anonymously would be better for some volunteers/cultures. Our mentors have often stated that we have secure voting solutions available, but maybe this is overkill and time-consuming, and it would be enough to allow people to send their lists to a mentor (if available), who would repost them here.
It is not an issue that I feel personally: it's OK for me to continue with public messages on ooo-dev. But it could be that others have problems, and in that case I'd encourage them to speak up so that we can find a way to ensure that everyone can express their opinions.
Regards, Andrea.
