Just to confirm that I have received no offline nominations. Sent from my tablet On Sep 19, 2012 12:00 AM, "Andrew Rist" <andrew.r...@oracle.com> wrote:
> (top posting after private messages - I cannot describe the shame I > feel... ;-) > > I have an option that I believe will handle Andrea's concerns. I have > spoken with Ross and he is amenable to receiving Proposed PMC entries off > list. > If anyone is concerned about sending their list to ooo-dev, you can send > it to Ross ( rgardler at apache) instead, and at the end of the period > (next Sunday), he will send an anonymized summary of the votes he has > received, along with a breakdown of submissions by committers/PPMC vs other > community members. > > We have received lists from 10 people and have 25 nominees with multiple > votes. It would be great to get even more feedback. > > A. > > > > On 9/18/2012 1:17 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> On 17/09/2012 Andrew Rist wrote: >> >>> * This is not a vote. This is a search for consensus. Please no '-1' >>> replies. Let's see what this process produces, and then discuss >>> from there. >>> >> >> It seems that the process is working quite well, and that we are on the >> right way to bootstrap a PMC by consensus. >> >> I surely don't want to block the current process, but I wonder if >> allowing people to "vote" (actually, express preferences) anonymously would >> be better for some volunteers/cultures. Our mentors have often stated that >> we have secure voting solutions available, but maybe this is overkill and >> time-consuming, and it would be enough to allow people to send their lists >> to a mentor (if available), who would repost them here. >> >> It is not an issue that I feel personally: it's OK for me to continue >> with public messages on ooo-dev. But it could be that others have problems, >> and in that case I'd encourage them to speak up so that we can find a way >> to ensure that everyone can express their opinions. >> >> Regards, >> Andrea. >> > >
