On 17.10.2012 10:05, jan iversen wrote:
Thanks for your support.
a documentation question: do you find it a good idea to have (as in the
document) a non-technical round-trip intended for translators etc. and then
the deep technical round trip, or should I reduce it to just the technical
part ?
Both parts are very valuable so I would keep both of them, but not
necessarily on the same page.
Sorry for not having formulated 9.7 very clearly. It has nothing to do with
the actual format, but with the content:
My idea was to check for:
- Is all messages translated
- Has existing messages that have changed in the source code also changed
in the translation
- Is all term like e.x. "Cancel" translated to e.x. "Fortryd" in ALL
instances (that is today not the case.
- Is all accellerators identical, if e.g. there is a translation "F~ortryd"
then that it is a problem it in another file it is "Fo~rtryd"
I hope that makes 9.7 more understandable.
I understand and agree that it would be a good thing to have. I you can
do that then do that :-)
-Andre
