Hello People,
I am the one to blame for the wishlists items :)) [thanks toma
for kindly handling me :) he spends definitive amount of time
on me :)]
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 01:49:30PM +0200, Igor Khasilev wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Tamas SZERB wrote:
> This was already but unfortunately missed in documentation (fixed now):
>
> in context of peer description use
>
> peer_access [!]ACL [!]ACL ... ;
>
> You can use several such lines and any acls here.
I think I'll see the docs again, there are places to clear up things,
fix grammatical and other mistakes :)
If you would write a non-formatted non-enduser-readable translation of the
russian doc (which requires definitively less time than to write a real,
formatted, pretty doc) we (or I) could use it and write a nice readable and
useful doc. oops lacks of good english documentation, and maybe the
example config could be improved a bit as well.
I think I'll help Toma to update the manpage as well, since it sucks. :)
> In the latest release I also added support for non-icp peers (like
> Europeonline) with fail detection.
Is your changelog completely up-to-date and mentions every feature? I'll
cross-check with the docs then....
> > Other.
> >
> > Maybe it is good to serve more statistic about the running cache:
> > * actual kb/s (all thread summarized)
> > * what do the threads do (idle/connecting/transferring/dns)
> > and what files are transferring at this moment,
> > from where to who?
>
> This is done partially:
>
> oopsctl requests
>
> will show you some statistics. It (this oopsctl command) also have several
> options which have to be documented...
This is the experimental version I suppose?
oops version 1.4.22 doesn't know this.
By the way, Toma, you can find the Debian/Potato compiled oops and libdb
at ftp://yikes.exabit.hu/pub/linux/homebrew/oops/, take it as you wish.
If you think you can distribute the deb's on your site (I'd create a
<sitename>/oops/ alias for it if I were you ;)).
> > And me and my friend seems the CPU load is always 0.00. Is it a bug on
> > linux?
>
> I think, this is normal, because each thread (except, probably, main) give
> very small load to system.
Well very small is more than zero:
## -- General info --
Version : 1.4.22
Uptime : 40854sec, (0day(s), 11hour(s), 20min(s))
Last update : Thu Nov 16 13:38:32 2000
Clients : 11 (max: 74)
HTTP requests: 61514
ICP requests: 8109
Total hits : 12606
Thread pool : 83 ready to serve (out of 250 max)
Curr.req.rate: 1.28 req/sec (max: 6.35)
Tot.req.rate : 1.51 req/sec
Curr.hit.rate: 22.08 %
Tot.hit.rate : 20.49 %
Curr.icp.rate: 1.43 req/sec (max: 3.72)
## -- CPU --
Total usage : 270ms
Delta usage : 0ms
Delta time : 60000ms
Curr. CPU : 0.00 % (0.00s+0.00u)
Aver. CPU : 0.00 % (0.00s+0.00u)
regards,
grin
=====================================================================
If you would like to unsubscribe from this list send message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe oops-eng" in message body.
Archive is accessible on http://www.paco.net/oops/
