Rick McGuire wrote: > There's a section in the ooRexx Reference (4.3.2 Crossreference of > Methods) that's seems very strange to me, and is really of dubious > value. I don't know of any o-o language that would choose to document > a language this way. A method taken out of context that way is not > much use, and identically named methods might have completely > different meanings depending on the method context. > > And unfortunately, this table has to be updated manually, which is > going to be a serious pain. The information contained here is > actually duplicated in the index. If you go to the "method" entry in > the index, there's essentially the same cross-reference information as > in this table....but this one is automatically generated for us. On > top of that, there's several paragraphs of information about how > methods behave that are buried at the bottom of this section that are > of use, but are likely to be skipped over because of the length of > this table. > > I'm proposing that this table be removed, but the information at the > end be retained and the section be renamed to something reflecting the > remaining content. > > Rick > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > I agree, nuke it.
David Ashley ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
