On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's a section in the ooRexx Reference (4.3.2 Crossreference of
> Methods) that's seems very strange to me, and is really of dubious
> value.  ...
>
> I'm proposing that this table be removed, but the information at the
> end be retained and the section be renamed to something reflecting the
> remaining content.

Yeah, that sounds good to me.

--
Mark Miesfeld

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to