With the exception of the license information, both versions look the same to me.
Rick On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:18 PM Gil Barmwater <gbarmwa...@alum.rpi.edu> wrote: > It has been suggested that the font-size used for the body of the HTML > files is a bit too small. I have created a version of the rxmath book with > a slightly larger font-size and I would like some feedback on your > preference - the original, smaller > <https://www.dropbox.com/s/lqv49jl2obgwxjn/rxmath.zip?dl=0> version > versus the newer, larger > <https://www.dropbox.com/s/f48m470358i6ai0/rxmath-bigger.zip?dl=0> > version. You need to download them both, unzip them to separate folders and > open the index.html file of each folder in your browser window. You can > then navigate through the book(s) and see which version you prefer. TIA, > > Gil > On 3/8/2020 4:51 PM, Gil Barmwater wrote: > > Newest version of rxmath HTML files/folders is here > <https://www.dropbox.com/s/lqv49jl2obgwxjn/rxmath.zip?dl=0>. I believe > I've gotten the majority of the issues handled so please have another look. > > Thanks, Gil > On 3/8/2020 11:52 AM, Gil Barmwater wrote: > > Hi P.O., > > Thanks for doing the detailed comparison and confirming that the > differences were ones of which I was aware. > > I have experimented with deleting the width=297 from BOTH the div tags and > the span tags and the results look great! Now to find how that attribute is > getting generated! > > Gil > On 3/8/2020 10:19 AM, P.O. Jonsson wrote: > > Dear Gil, > > Rony have given most of the information already but I have listed some > differences as seen in the output, please have a look in the attached pdf > > For what is is worth: most differences I can see are to your advantage! I > think this is coming a long way already. > > > > > H�lsningar/Regards/Gr�sse, > P.O. Jonsson > oor...@jonases.se > > > > Am 08.03.2020 um 15:11 schrieb Gil Barmwater <gbarmwa...@alum.rpi.edu>: > > Thanks a lot Rony for that research! I had noticed that the HTML produced > by Publican used object tags while the newer Docbook stylesheets produced > img tags but that is as far as I had gotten. Now to see where the width=297 > comes from and what happens when it is removed. Thanks again! GB > On 3/8/2020 9:47 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > > On 07.03.2020 20:52, Gil Barmwater wrote: > > I've made more progress here and now have a set of HTML files, etc. for > the rxmath book. In spite of the fact that the source is essentially the > same and the stylesheets are as well, the output appears different in a > number of ways. I can only attribute this to the different versions of the > DocBook stylesheets being used by the two processes or possibly the > different way the two handle xinclude. I have put the zipped folder in my > Dropbox here <https://www.dropbox.com/s/lqv49jl2obgwxjn/rxmath.zip?dl=0> > and would appreciate feedback on what to tackle in order to make them look > better. > > Your HTML renderings look great, even better than P.O. Publican > renderings, congratulations !! > > The area that needs attention is how the size for the graphics gets > defined, it is also where your renderings look better than Publican's, > where clipping occurs. Example: > > - 2.3 RxCalcSqrt() > > - Gil's HTML text for the syntax diagram: > > <div class="mediaobject"><img src="images/funcs/funcs_rxcalcsqrt.svg" > width="297" /> > > - Publican's HTML text for the syntax diagram: > > <div class="mediaobject"><object > data="images/funcs/funcs_rxcalcsqrt.svg" type="image/svg+xml" width="297"> > </object></div> > > > The general problem with the definition of the size of the syntax diagrams > lies in setting the width to the absolute value "297" pixels! > > The original docbook text for this is: > > <imagedata fileref="images/funcs/funcs_rxcalcsqrt.svg" scale="55" /> > > The svg has a bounding box of 472x68: > > <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"; <http://www.w3.org/2000/svg> > width="472" height="68"> > > So it seems that "297" is probably hardcoded in the xsl. > > This has in principal the downside that all images, irrespectible how wide > they are in reality, get reduced/enlarged to fit the 297px width. This > makes the syntax diagrams look irregularily sized and ugly. (In the > Publican case it is even worse as there the object-element is used which > will clip the image.) > > Consulting [1] one can see that 297px width corresponds to 159.28 mm = > 15.93 cm = 6.22 in. > > Looking at all the svg bounding boxes in the rxmath book, the widest one > is "funcs_rxcalcpower.svg" with a width of 634 px = 167.75 mm = 16.78 cm = > 6.55 in. If rendering for paper the printable width (A4) is wide enough to > host the syntax diagram without any distortion or clipping. > > Therefore I would suggest to remove the width attribute from the img > element (and use the img element [2] over the object element [3]). > > Finally, both, the Publican and Gil's HTML renderings show that the svg > images display and scale in the highest resolution. > @P.O.: there would be� no need anymore to recreate the HTML renderings > for the rexxpg book. > > So, Gil, thumbs up!� +1 > > Great job! > > ---rony > > [1] "Convert Pixel (X) to Millimeter": > <https://www.unitconverters.net/typography/pixel-x-to-millimeter.htm> > <https://www.unitconverters.net/typography/pixel-x-to-millimeter.htm> > [2] HTML "img" element: <https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_img.asp> > <https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_img.asp> > [3] HTML "object" element: <https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_object.asp> > <https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_object.asp> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing > listOorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > -- > Gil Barmwater > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing > listOorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > -- > Gil Barmwater > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing > listOorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > -- > Gil Barmwater > > -- > Gil Barmwater > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
