On 08.03.2020 21:51, Gil Barmwater wrote: > > Newest version of rxmath HTML files/folders is here > <https://www.dropbox.com/s/lqv49jl2obgwxjn/rxmath.zip?dl=0>. I believe I've > gotten the majority of > the issues handled so please have another look. > Gil, I think you have solved the image problem and the HTML renderings look therefore very nice, congratulations!
--- If nitpicking a little bit: it seems that the body font is a little bit too small for reading and too small in relation to the images. Looking at "Common_Content\css\common.css" the font-size is mostly given in "em" and in four cases only in "pt": * body: font-size:12pt; * span.book: font-size:11pt; * .reports h2, .reports h3: font-size:10pt; * .results h2, .results h3: font-size:10pt; There are also two instances relative font-sizes (relative to the size of the body=base font): * a.version:before: font-size:smaller; * .books .pdf: font-size:smaller; I would suggest to change the body/base font-size from "pt" units to "em" units as most of the font-sizes among all variations of the fonts are "em" based. Overall the font-size relations to each other seem to benefit. After testing a little bit (but more experiments probably needed) the following font-size seems to work alright: * body: font-size:0.9em; But your mileage may vary. Again, kudos, the HTML renderings look great as they are already! ---rony
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
