I will disable the uploads of the redundant installers, 8 -> 2 but I do not dare touching the Windows installer, I leave that to you or Erich. As you say it seems to be a hard task.
Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, P.O. Jonsson [email protected] > Am 12.04.2022 um 16:39 schrieb Rick McGuire <[email protected]>: > > Go ahead and take a crack at it, but I seriously doubt it will work. Mike's > solution works because he only has to worry about a single executable. In the > ooRexx case, we would need to insert this logic into both rexx.exe and > rexxhide.exe, and have the logic to handle every single one of the binary > artifacts of a release, including multiple dlls and the rexx.img binary > image. Not really practical. > > Rick > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:26 AM P.O. Jonsson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On the RexxLa <mailto:[email protected]> list it was noted that we > have 8 different installers for Windows, which is a bit confusing. Since it > appears that windows.x86_32.exe and windows.x86_64.exe work on all Windows > 7/8/10 platforms I suggest to stop uploading the additional installers built > on W7/W8.1/W10 Virtual Machines. > > I still think we should continue building & testing on those platforms. > > Mike Cowlishaw offered a solution for a single installer for 32/64 bit > Windows in that thread > > Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, > P.O. Jonsson > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel> > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
