Foreword: This is not a rant. Well. Maybe it is. I'm just typing down some thoughts. My (humble) thoughts. Not meant to offend anyone.

Simon wrote:
-use a more usable default theme - I vote for this clone of monobook
(http://themes.tikiwiki.org/tiki-index.php?page=Tikipedia), because I
dislike both fixed and three column layouts

Wikis are nice and all, but in our case the main project page you look as less as a wiki as possible (doesn't mean you can't use it as a back-end, but you should hide as much of the wiki-related stuff (edit, history, etc.) as possible unless the user is logged in).

Wikipedia gets away with emphasizing the wiki features because that's what Wikipedia is all about. We should emphasize the content.

"Category > Foo > Bar" is also bad style. It's either redundant or (more often) a symptom of a horrible site structure. You should not browse through a list to get the information you want - that's what hyperlinks are all about.

And talking about distinctiveness - the first thing that comes to my mind when I see Monobook is Wikipedia. You don't want OGP to be associated with "interesting and all, but let's check a trusted source before I buy anything".

Looking through the themes on that site I found this one the most appealing:

http://themes.tikiwiki.org/tiki-index.php?page=Kubrick

It does not feel like a wiki. Well. It feels like a blog, but without the login-box (just a link in the upper right corner in gray-on-white would be enough), without the comboboxes, without shoutbox (yuck!) and without the blog-like-content it's just a "normal" website.

I don't like those dropdown menus aswell but that's just me.

Now imagine the white content box mostly empty, a big OGD1 in isometric view (on white) with some computer-generated shadow... Yea, it's not perfect. Still some blog-like. But you could fix that...

Felix
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to