We should have already been at 3.0 or later when we stopped supporting
PostgreSQL 8.4, if I am not mistaken.
I vote for 3.0 or 12.09. The latter would be "throw out the versioning
info and replace it with date-based".
As a basis for "3.0" on the old system of versioning I put forward my
new_xulrunner branch as a significant enough change, pulling us from
the 1.9ish/3.6 series xulrunner to.....I dunno, what are they up to
now? 12?
Thomas Berezansky
Merrimack Valley Library Consortium
Quoting Bill Erickson <[email protected]>:
Hi all,
As we look toward planning the next release of Evergreen (after
2.2), there are a couple of simple, but important questions we need
to answer.
1. Is it time to jump to 3.0 or do we stay with 2.3?
I'm not aware of any significant architectural changes (e.g.
changing PG versions) on the horizon, which would suggest we stick
with 2.3. Perhaps it's too early to tell?
For reference: http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=versioning
2. Do we return to the originally proposed March/September release schedule?
My impression is there's a general consensus to do this. It would
lead to a shortened development cycle for next release, so I would
like to give everyone a chance to voice their concerns / alternate
suggestions and put this to a vote.
Once we have these questions answered, we can start outlining a schedule.
Thanks everyone.
-b
--
Bill Erickson
| Senior Software Developer
| Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
| phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
| email: [email protected]
| web: http://esilibrary.com
