Any particular reasons for the March/September release schedule versus any other months?
As far as versions, are there known pros and cons for either scheme? Is anything wrong with the current scheme? Alexey Lazar PALS Information System Developer and Integrator 507-389-2907 http://www.mnpals.org/ On May 15, 2012, at 10:46 , Bill Erickson wrote: > > Hi all, > > As we look toward planning the next release of Evergreen (after 2.2), there > are a couple of simple, but important questions we need to answer. > > 1. Is it time to jump to 3.0 or do we stay with 2.3? > > I'm not aware of any significant architectural changes (e.g. changing PG > versions) on the horizon, which would suggest we stick with 2.3. Perhaps > it's too early to tell? > > For reference: http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=versioning > > 2. Do we return to the originally proposed March/September release schedule? > > My impression is there's a general consensus to do this. It would lead to a > shortened development cycle for next release, so I would like to give > everyone a chance to voice their concerns / alternate suggestions and put > this to a vote. > > Once we have these questions answered, we can start outlining a schedule. > > Thanks everyone. > > -b > > -- > Bill Erickson > | Senior Software Developer > | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source > | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) > | email: [email protected] > | web: http://esilibrary.com
