Very good. Thanks, Anoop, Kathy and Jason, exactly the info I needed to understand. +1 on schedule, makes sense.
Alexey Lazar PALS Information System Developer and Integrator 507-389-2907 http://www.mnpals.org/ On May 15, 2012, at 12:11 , Anoop Atre wrote: > To add to the thread Kathy posted, this has a few more responses attached > towards the end. > > +1 March/September release schedule > > No opinion on version numbering. > > http://georgialibraries.markmail.org/message/2ofnmjgoku4zeng2 > > On 05/15/2012 12:51 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: >>>> Any particular reasons for the March/September release schedule versus >>>> any other months? >> >> There was a bit of explanation for why those two months were chosen when the >> End of Life policy was announced in December - >> http://markmail.org/message/regauiczh6a3e2ro. >> >> I support continuing with the March/September release schedules. >> >> I have no opinion on version numbering. >> >> kathy >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> Kathy Lussier >> Project Coordinator >> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative >> (508) 756-0172 >> (508) 755-3721 (fax) >> [email protected] >> IM: kmlussier (AOL& Yahoo) >> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier >> >> >> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:open-ils- >>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Lazar, Alexey >>>> Vladimirovich >>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:42 PM >>>> To: Evergreen Development Discussion List >>>> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] After 2.2 naming / schedule >>>> >>>> Any particular reasons for the March/September release schedule versus >>>> any other months? >>>> >>>> As far as versions, are there known pros and cons for either scheme? Is >>>> anything wrong with the current scheme? >>>> >>>> Alexey Lazar >>>> PALS >>>> Information System Developer and Integrator >>>> 507-389-2907 >>>> http://www.mnpals.org/ >>>> >>>> On May 15, 2012, at 10:46 , Bill Erickson wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> As we look toward planning the next release of Evergreen (after 2.2), >>>> there are a couple of simple, but important questions we need to >>>> answer. >>>>> >>>>> 1. Is it time to jump to 3.0 or do we stay with 2.3? >>>>> >>>>> I'm not aware of any significant architectural changes (e.g. changing >>>> PG versions) on the horizon, which would suggest we stick with 2.3. >>>> Perhaps it's too early to tell? >>>>> >>>>> For reference: http://evergreen- >>>> ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=versioning >>>>> >>>>> 2. Do we return to the originally proposed March/September release >>>> schedule? >>>>> >>>>> My impression is there's a general consensus to do this. It would >>>> lead to a shortened development cycle for next release, so I would like >>>> to give everyone a chance to voice their concerns / alternate >>>> suggestions and put this to a vote. >>>>> >>>>> Once we have these questions answered, we can start outlining a >>>> schedule. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks everyone. >>>>> >>>>> -b >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Bill Erickson >>>>> | Senior Software Developer >>>>> | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source >>>>> | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) >>>>> | email: [email protected] >>>>> | web: http://esilibrary.com >> >> > > -- > -- > Anoop Atre > | Systems Administrator > | [email protected] > | 770-709-5595 > Equinox Software Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source > -- > "Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens" > ~ Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller
