Noting for the record that bug 1739290 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1739290> is on Equinox's community-funded Cataloging Bugfix list, and we do anticipate having a fix in time for 3.2 -- which should also fix blocker 1746536 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1746536>, and non-blocker 1747664 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1747664>.
Also, I'm not a dev but FWIW I'm +1 for XUL removal for all reasons listed above. On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM Daniel Wells <dbwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm +1 for removal. I think the 3.1 extension provides both a usable > safety valve and adequate incentive to clear the webstaff blockers in a > timely manner. > > Dan > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Boyer, Jason A <jbo...@library.in.gov> > wrote: > >> I'm also +1 for removal. We've been planning for it since 3.0; may as >> well pull off that band-aid. Those not ready will have extended 3.1 support >> while the foolhardy (Hi!) can take the ship out to see and see what leaks. >> If it's not 100% acceptable for everyone at 3.2.0, hopefully 3.2.2 or >> thereabouts will be good enough without having to drag a mummified XUL all >> the way to 3.3. >> >> >> >> Jason >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jason Boyer >> >> MIS Supervisor >> >> Indiana State Library >> >> http://library.in.gov/ >> >> >> >> *From:* Open-ils-dev [mailto: >> open-ils-dev-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Bill >> Erickson >> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2018 11:57 AM >> *To:* Public Open-ILS tech discussion < >> OPEN-ILS-DEV@list.georgialibraries.org> >> *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Informal vote to apply XUL-removal patch to 3.2 >> >> >> >> **** This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments >> or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. **** >> ------------------------------ >> >> Devs, >> >> >> >> I'd like to have an informal vote on whether we should remove (well, >> disable) the XUL client in 3.2. Delaying the decision is complicating the >> release process. If it's clear which way the wind is blowing, we can set a >> date for the final vote and patching. >> >> >> >> Knowing what you know today about outstanding webstaff blockers (a few >> were just added), would you vote to proceed with XUL removal? Can I get a >> show of hands, yea or nay? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> -b >> >> >> > > -- Andrea Buntz Neiman Project Manager for Software Development Equinox Open Library Initiative abnei...@equinoxinitiative.org 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) x5583 *www.equinoxinitiative.org <http://www.equinoxinitiative.org>*