On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:31:59AM -0400, Mike Rylander wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Kathy Lussier <kluss...@masslnc.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We've been spending some time investigating Template Toolkit and what work > > needs to be done before it is ready for implementation in our networks. I've > > been keeping up with changes being made to the working release notes page at > > http://www.open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=dev%3Aopac%3Atemplate-toolkit%3Arelease_notes and > > noticed a recent addition regarding the fact that TPac does not maintain the > > concept of search range. As this note was added under"other considerations" > > instead of "features not yet implemented," I'm curious if this means there > > are no current plans to implement this concept of search range. Is it > > something we can expect to see in either the short- or long-range future for > > TPac? > > > > My personal opinion is that is a bug -- but my opinion is by no means > authoritative and, because the TT-OPAC is being built initially to > support specific requirements, is perhaps even not valid. (Also note: > I've not touched the code myself.) > > However, the structure and design of TT-OPAC (and the API calls it > uses to gather data to render) will make it relatively simple to add > this back as an alternate results-page template.
Yep. It basically supports ranges at all levels except at the UI. -b -- Bill Erickson | Senior Software Developer | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: erick...@esilibrary.com | web: http://esilibrary.com