I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the extra jar then the vote can proceed.
If I go back and remove the jar, republish etc. I'm assuming we'll have to restart the clock on the vote, correct me if I'm wrong in this regard. On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the record, I'm still +1 for release. But if you want to cut another to fix the minor items that have been surfaced, it's ok with me. Craig On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote: > Mike-- > > RE the KEYS file, you can just ssh to people.apache.org and check > the KEYS file out directly into /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ > directory. No uploading necessary! :) > > To be sure -- the rest of the items are just nits which could mostly > be cleaned up just by deleting the directories / files after they're > uploaded. I don't have strong feelings about them, so just do > whatever the community feels is best. Certainly, it's fine to ship > them for 0.9.7. > > Cheers, > Eddie > > > > On 4/18/07, Michael Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks Marc, >> >> How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ >> KEYS ? The >> only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it, >> but not >> where the key needs to go. >> >> Before I create another release candidate (to remove the docbook >> jar), >> should we try to address the other minor issues? Craig and Patrick >> have >> responded to most of them, but there are a few others. >> >> Minor issues: >> >> - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1 >> > files, which are unnecessary. >> >> >> They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since they aren't >> hurting >> anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them though. I think the >> gpg >> plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1 files too (I'd have to check >> though). >> >> - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at: >> > <source-dist>/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log >> >> >> This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create >> another >> release candidate. >> >> The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to. If any of >> them can be >> fixed quickly then we can include them in the new release candidate. >> >> On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make >> things a >> > little easier to manage. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: >> > >> > >> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we >> > >> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, >> > >> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as >> > >> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing >> > >> phase had access to the stylesheets. >> > > >> > > Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain >> > > dependencies? >> > > >> > > -Patrick >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Patrick Linskey >> > > BEA Systems, Inc. >> > > >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> _ >> > > _ >> > > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may >> > > contain >> > > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and >> > > affiliated >> > > entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted >> > > and/or >> > > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the >> > > individual >> > > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended >> > > recipient, >> > > and have received this message in error, please immediately >> return >> > > this >> > > by email and then delete it. >> > > >> > >> -----Original Message----- >> > >> From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> > >> Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux >> > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM >> > >> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: >> > >> >> > >>>> - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose >> license is >> > >>>> unclear; this is: >> > >>>> <binary-dist>/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip >> > >>> >> > >>> That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the >> > >> docs, but >> > >>> not by the runtime. >> > >> >> > >> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we >> > >> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, >> > >> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as >> > >> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing >> > >> phase had access to the stylesheets. >> > >> >> > >> I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to >> > >> the exclude list (revision 530094). >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may >> > > contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries >> > > and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, >> proprietary, >> > > copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely >> for >> > > the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you >> > > are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in >> > > error, please immediately return this by email and then delete >> it. >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> -Michael Dick >> Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
-- -Michael Dick
